Knowledge fuels change - Support energypedia!
For over 10 years, energypedia has been connecting energy experts around the world — helping them share knowledge, learn from each other, and accelerate the global energy transition.
Today, we ask for your support to keep this platform free and accessible to all. Even a small contribution makes a big difference! If just 10–20% of our 60,000+ monthly visitors donated the equivalent of a cup of coffee — €5 — Energypedia would be fully funded for a whole year.
Is the knowledge you’ve gained through Energypedia this year worth €5 or more?
Your donation keeps the platform running, helps us create new knowledge products, and contributes directly to achieving SDG 7.


Donate now and support open access to energy expertise

Thank you for your support, your donation, big or small, truly matters!

Difference between revisions of "Storage"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
(→‎Gravity Battery: added citation)
***** (***** | *****)
(outlook for both types of storage)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* price
 
* price
 
* degradation
 
* degradation
 +
Outlook: going to become cheaper
  
 
[[:Category:Batteries]]
 
[[:Category:Batteries]]
Line 31: Line 32:
 
**underground
 
**underground
 
***[https://gravitricity.com/ Gravitricity] - using deep mines. Best for shafts >300m deep. Cost: 171 USD per MWh (less than 1/2 of the cost of Li-ion battery)<ref>https://gravitricity.com/technology/</ref>
 
***[https://gravitricity.com/ Gravitricity] - using deep mines. Best for shafts >300m deep. Cost: 171 USD per MWh (less than 1/2 of the cost of Li-ion battery)<ref>https://gravitricity.com/technology/</ref>
 
+
Outlook: cost breakthrough is expected
 
[[Category:Storage]]
 
[[Category:Storage]]
 +
<references />

Revision as of 01:24, 21 November 2021

Battery

Pros:

  • density

Cons:

  • price
  • degradation

Outlook: going to become cheaper

Category:Batteries

Gravity Battery

Pros:

  • price per MWh stored
  • longevity

Cons:

  • density

Types:

Outlook: cost breakthrough is expected