Knowledge fuels change
For over a decade, Energypedia has shared free, reliable energy expertise with the world.
We’re now facing a serious funding gap.
Help keep this platform alive — your donation, big or small, truly matters!
Thank you for your support
Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m (→Preparation) |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | = Introduction = | + | = Introduction = |
| − | The Impacts Monitoring Group of [[Energising Development (EnDev)|Energising Development has]] developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments. | + | The Impacts Monitoring Group of [[Energising Development (EnDev)|Energising Development has]] developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments. |
| − | We recommend to: | + | We recommend to: |
| − | *use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|'''list of indicators''']] | + | *use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|'''list of indicators''']] |
| − | *conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy | + | *conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy |
| − | *use a [[Theory Based Approach|'''theory based approach''']] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | + | *use a [[Theory Based Approach|'''theory based approach''']] by applying the result chain for developing the study design |
| − | *use a [[Mixed Methods|'''mixed methods approach''']]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) | + | *use a [[Mixed Methods|'''mixed methods approach''']]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) |
| − | *include [[Control Groups|'''control groups''']] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study | + | *include [[Control Groups|'''control groups''']] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study |
| − | *consider [[ | + | *consider [[Research Ethics|'''research ethics''']] |
| + | <br> | ||
| + | The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support. | ||
| − | |||
= Preparation = | = Preparation = | ||
Revision as of 09:50, 10 September 2012
Introduction
The Impacts Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.
We recommend to:
- use the recommended list of indicators
- conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
- use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
- use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
- include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
- consider research ethics
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
Preparation
| Tasks | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators |
|
ToR Consultants: |
| Selection Consultant/ Enumerators |
|
|
| Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country |
|
|
| Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators |
Rural Electrifciation: Cooking:
| |
| Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods) |
PRA tools, Interview Guidelines, Observation criteria etc.
| |
| Sampling/ Selection target Group |
|
|
| Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting |
|
|
Implementation
| Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Logistics | Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews |
|
| Conducting Interviews |
| |
| Data entry |
Data Analysis/ Reporting
| Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Data analysis |
| |
| Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop) |
|
|
| Report writing (+ summary writing) |
|
|
| Handover of raw data |
|



















