Difference between revisions of "SE4Jobs Toolbox - Co-benefits"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
#Which '''kinds of co-benefits''' can be expected from RE and EE in the short and longer term, how do they relate to and interact with the concerns of the groups mentioned above, and what kinds of reactions is this likely to elicit? Areas in which to consider possible co-benefits are:<br/><br/><ol style="list-style-type:lower-alpha;"> | #Which '''kinds of co-benefits''' can be expected from RE and EE in the short and longer term, how do they relate to and interact with the concerns of the groups mentioned above, and what kinds of reactions is this likely to elicit? Areas in which to consider possible co-benefits are:<br/><br/><ol style="list-style-type:lower-alpha;"> | ||
<li>'''Local employment and development''': To which extent will these technologies act as a driver of growth and create new sources of income for local populations? How many (direct, indirect, induced) jobs could be created; for whom (e.g. youth, women or men); for which level of qualification (skilled / unskilled) and for what duration (short / long term)? How much added value would be created from the expansion of RE/EE, and how would this affect economic productivity? To which extent would these new opportunities help to reduce the overall resource and carbon-intensity of an economy and stimulate the evolution of more sound, sustainable modes of production and consumption? What role will these new economic opportunities play in supporting a better alignment of the economy as a whole with the increasingly low-carbon economy of the 21<sup>st</sup> Century?</li> | <li>'''Local employment and development''': To which extent will these technologies act as a driver of growth and create new sources of income for local populations? How many (direct, indirect, induced) jobs could be created; for whom (e.g. youth, women or men); for which level of qualification (skilled / unskilled) and for what duration (short / long term)? How much added value would be created from the expansion of RE/EE, and how would this affect economic productivity? To which extent would these new opportunities help to reduce the overall resource and carbon-intensity of an economy and stimulate the evolution of more sound, sustainable modes of production and consumption? What role will these new economic opportunities play in supporting a better alignment of the economy as a whole with the increasingly low-carbon economy of the 21<sup>st</sup> Century?</li> | ||
− | <li>''Improved energy safety and security'': To what degree can RE and EE lower dependence on fossil fuels and enhance the resilience of an energy system? Do RE provide a useful approach to electrifying remote areas (or other marginal groups) that lack access to modern energy services? Can decentralized RE lower the costs of providing power to such non-electrified communities (compared to fossil fuels)?</li> | + | <li>'''Improved energy safety and security''': To what degree can RE and EE lower dependence on fossil fuels and enhance the resilience of an energy system? Do RE provide a useful approach to electrifying remote areas (or other marginal groups) that lack access to modern energy services? Can decentralized RE lower the costs of providing power to such non-electrified communities (compared to fossil fuels)?</li> |
− | <li>''Financial and macro-economic impacts:'' How do RE and EE impact external and internal financial flows? How do they affect the trade balance and spending power of a country? Do they open up new avenues for domestic investments and create new jobs and sources of income for public entities and private households that (over)compensate for losses in the conventional energy sector?</li> | + | <li>'''Financial and macro-economic impacts''''':'' How do RE and EE impact external and internal financial flows? How do they affect the trade balance and spending power of a country? Do they open up new avenues for domestic investments and create new jobs and sources of income for public entities and private households that (over)compensate for losses in the conventional energy sector?</li> |
+ | <li>'''Environmental and health impacts''': How much can RE and EE contribute to lowering air pollution and health hazards? To what extent can RE and EE investments lower climate change related impacts, such as heat stress, water scarcity or malnutrition?</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
=== How can the assessment of co-benefits be addressed? <span style="line-height: 21px"><span class="mw-customtoggle-title4" style="font-size:small; font-weight: bold; display:inline-block; float:center; color: blue"><span class="mw-customtoggletext">'''[Expand]'''</span></span></span><br/> === | === How can the assessment of co-benefits be addressed? <span style="line-height: 21px"><span class="mw-customtoggle-title4" style="font-size:small; font-weight: bold; display:inline-block; float:center; color: blue"><span class="mw-customtoggletext">'''[Expand]'''</span></span></span><br/> === |
Revision as of 15:05, 17 November 2017
SE4Jobs Toolbox – Laying the foundations for a sustainable development
Existing Capacities | Co-benefits | Trade-offs |
ToolsPRODUSE EQuIP CADRE Interactive AILEG HELIO ELMA |
What is the issue of co-benefits about? [Expand]
Expanding RE and improving EE can lead to numerous co-benefits, which can (more than) justify the high upfront investments. For example, co-benefits include:
Providing evidence for these co-benefits can strengthen their legitimacy and boost support or reduce opposition. They should therefore be taken into account from the outset, alongside the main motivations in energy policy for investing in RE and EE. Why is the issue of co-benefits important for the expansion of RE and EE? [Expand]
Strategies and policy measures that advance RE and EE compete with other policy goals over (more or less) scarce resources. Quite often, superficial assessments of the various technologies underestimate the benefits of a reduced dependency on fossil fuel energy, all the more so as externalities are generally not taken into account in the energy price. A better awareness of what co-benefits exist, and how they can be ‘harvested’ and distributed, can substantially increase support for RE and EE policies and investments. They are therefore vital for any large-scale and truly sustainable transition towards a new, low-carbon energy mix. What are key questions for addressing the issue of co-benefits? [Expand]
Identifying the co-benefits of RE/EE can support your efforts in at least two key ways: by broadening your support base among societal stakeholders and by showing that the co-benefits for society outweigh the initial investment costs. Therefore, you have to (a) correctly identify the key concerns of the most relevant actors in your policy context and ensure that your respective roll-out strategies address them, (b) assess how they are likely to react to your proposals and whether they may turn into supporters or not, and (c) collect and communicate conclusive evidence substantiating the various positive (or negative) consequences of investments in RE/EE in the short and longer term. Thus, key questions to consider are:
How can the assessment of co-benefits be addressed? [Expand]
[Text] Background studies [Expand]
[Text] |
Good Practices
Brazil China India Mexico South Africa Turkey |
Reference
This article is part of the RE-ACTIVATE project. RE-ACTIVATE “Promoting Employment through Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency in the MENA Region” is implemented by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). |