Impact Monitoring Guidelines

This article needs to be revised. Please rewrite the article according to the specifications below. Only remove this maintenance box after a thorough revision of this article. See the discussion page for more details or start a discussion there. In particular the following aspects and passages have been specified to be in need for a revision: (Red highlighted links don't have an existance web page. Please provide the link address).

Introduction

The Impacts Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.

We recommend to:

• use the recommended list of indicators
• conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
• use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
• use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
• include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
• consider research ethics

The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.

Preparation

Tasks	Materials/ Support	Library
Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators	Sample Terms for national / international consultants Sample Terms for enumerators	ToR Consultants: Tor Baseline Study (Rwanda PSP Hydro) ToR Survey french version
Selection Consultant/ Enumerators	Consultants
Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country	Checklist on relevant development goals	UNDP Energy Services for the Millennium Development Goals BMZ Sustainable Energy for Development
Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators (consider undesired side effects being positive or negative)	Sample Results Chain Impact Criteria and indicators	Cooking: Energy Impacts, Observation Fields and Indicators IA Kenya: Result Chain IA Ethiopia: Result Chain IA Kenya: Model List of Impacts, Observation Fields and Indicators
Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods)	Questionnaires for HH (stoves), stove producers, social institutions and restaurants using ICS PRA tools for focus group discussions (MAPP) Interview guidelines for village authorities Observation criteria for stoves in use (example lists of good cooking practices and of stove conditions)	Example Questionnaires (Impact Studies Material)
Sampling/ Selection target Group	Guidelines / Sampling & Selection Criterias Poverty criteria for selection of HH	Kenya: Selection Criteria for HH, SI, PU and Producers IA Kenya: Local Poverty criteria (example from local village authorities)
Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting	Training Material Training Agenda	Supervisors and Enumerators Example Training Agenda (french version) Kenya: ICS Training of Enumerators

Implementation

Task	Materials/ Support	Library
Logistics	Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews H1: Short Household Survey H2: Profound Household Survey H3: Qualitative Household Appraisal
Conducting Interviews		Manual Conducting Interviews (english version)  Manual Conducting Interviews (french version)
Data entry

 

Data Analysis/ Reporting

Task	Materials/ Support	Library
Data analysis	Guiding Questions for Data Analysis	Kenya Stove HH: Guiding Questions for data analysis Kenya Stove Producer: Guiding Question for data analysis
Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop)	Checklist for data interpretation
Report writing (+ summary writing)	Example for report summary Example for ICS description (Annex)	Kenya Stove HH: Example for report summary
Handover of raw data