Knowledge fuels change
For over a decade, Energypedia has shared free, reliable energy expertise with the world.
We’re now facing a serious funding gap.
Help keep this platform alive — your donation, big or small, truly matters!
Thank you for your support
Difference between revisions of "Impact Monitoring Guidelines"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m |
||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
= Data Analysis/ Reporting = | = Data Analysis/ Reporting = | ||
| − | {| | + | {| width="752" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="1" style="width: 100%; height: 236px;" |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | bgcolor="#0000ff" | '''<span style="color: rgb(255,255,255)">Task</span>''' | + | | bgcolor="#0000ff" | '''<span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Task</span>''' |
| − | | bgcolor="#0000ff" | '''<span style="color: rgb(255,255,255)">Materials/ Support</span>''' | + | | bgcolor="#0000ff" | '''<span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Materials/ Support</span>''' |
| − | | bgcolor="#0000ff" | '''<span style="color: rgb(255,255,255)">Library</span>''' | + | | bgcolor="#0000ff" | '''<span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Library</span>''' |
|- | |- | ||
| <font size="2">Data analysis</font> | | <font size="2">Data analysis</font> | ||
| | | | ||
| − | *<font color="#002bb8">[[ | + | *<font color="#002bb8">[[Guiding Questions for Data Analysis|<font size="2">Guiding Questions for Data Analysis</font> ]]</font> |
| | | | ||
| Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Handover of raw data | + | | |
| + | Handover of raw data | ||
| + | |||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 08:31, 21 November 2012
Introduction
The Impacts Monitoring Group of Energising Development has developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments.
We recommend to:
- use the recommended list of indicators
- conduct baseline studies before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy
- use a theory based approach by applying the result chain for developing the study design
- use a mixed methods approach: the logic of the comparative advantages of methods: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions)
- include control groups if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study
- consider research ethics
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
Preparation
| Tasks | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators |
|
ToR Consultants: |
| Selection Consultant/ Enumerators |
|
|
| Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country |
|
|
| Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators |
Rural Electrifciation: Cooking:
| |
| Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods) |
PRA tools, Interview Guidelines, Observation criteria etc.
| |
| Sampling/ Selection target Group |
|
|
| Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting |
|
|
Implementation
| Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Logistics | Checklist on how to implement HH Interviews |
|
| Conducting Interviews |
| |
| Data entry |
Data Analysis/ Reporting
| Task | Materials/ Support | Library |
| Data analysis |
| |
| Data interpretation – in exchange with the project team (in a workshop) |
|
|
| Report writing (+ summary writing) |
|
|
|
Handover of raw data |
|



















