Difference between revisions of "Understand User Needs"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
***** (***** | *****)
(Insert text and citations)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
==Guiding Principles==  
 
==Guiding Principles==  
−
There is an increasing amount of evidence that underlines the importance of taking into account the socio-cultural, economic and political dimensions of the specific local contexts in which off-grid energy interventions take place (Ockwell et al. 2018; Ulsrud et al. 2015). The importance of these contextual dimensions can be roughly categorized into three issues: a) understanding needs, b) securing engagement and c) addressing structures of inequality.
+
There is an increasing amount of evidence that underlines the importance of taking into account the socio-cultural, economic and political dimensions of the specific local contexts in which off-grid energy interventions take place<ref>Ockwell, D. ''et al.'' (2018) ‘The uptake and diffusion of solar power in Africa: Socio-cultural and political insights on a rapidly emerging socio-technical transition’, ''Energy Research & Social Science'', 44, pp. 122–129. Available at: <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.033</nowiki>.</ref><ref name=":0">Ulsrud, K., Winther, T., Palit, D., & Rohracher, H. (2015). Village-level solar power in Africa: Accelerating access to electricity services through a socio-technical design in Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science, 5, 34–44. <nowiki>https://doi.org/ka</nowiki></ref>. The importance of these contextual dimensions can be roughly categorized into three issues: a) understanding needs, b) securing engagement and c) addressing structures of inequality.
  
−
Understanding needs
+
==== Understanding needs ====
 +
When developing an electrification intervention, understanding aspirations and values of the people that get access to the electricity service is as important as solving the economic challenges (e.g. the accessibility and the financial ability to buy the required appliances). There is a diversity of benefits that electricity users can perceive as valuable, such as business opportunity, the elimination of labour intensive tasks, preservation of health, security, the ability to acquire knowledge, and comfort, among others. Understanding and properly addressing these context specific values of a population is an important factor to ensure communities’ endorsement to electrification interventions <ref name=":1">Eder, J. M., Mutsaerts, C. F., & Sriwannawit, P. (2015). Mini-grids and renewable energy in rural Africa: How diffusion theory explains adoption of electricity in Uganda. Energy Research & Social Science, 5, 45–54. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.014</nowiki></ref><ref name=":2">Hirmer, S., & Guthrie, P. (2017). The benefits of energy appliances in the off-grid energy sector based on seven off-grid initiatives in rural Uganda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 924–934. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.152</nowiki></ref>. The potential effects of access to electricity on practices linked to business activities of the served population are of particular interest in the design and implementation of electrification interventions. These types of effects are often gathered under the term “productive use of electricity” (PUE).
  
−
When developing an electrification intervention, understanding aspirations and values of the people that get access to the electricity service is as important as solving the economic challenges (e.g. the accessibility and the financial ability to buy the required appliances). There is a diversity of benefits that electricity users can perceive as valuable, such as business opportunity, the elimination of labour intensive tasks, preservation of health, security, the ability to acquire knowledge, and comfort, among others. Understanding and properly addressing these context specific values of a population is an important factor to ensure communities’ endorsement to electrification interventions (Eder et al., 2015; Hirmer & Guthrie, 2017). The potential effects of access to electricity on practices linked to business activities of the served population are of particular interest in the design and implementation of electrification interventions. These types of effects are often gathered under the term “productive use of electricity” (PUE).  
+
==== '''Securing communication and engagement''' ====
 +
The process of implementing a new local energy system implies introducing a series of changes in the physical and immaterial aspects of the lives of the local population. It is essential to engage local actors in all the phases of project development – i.e. in the process of introducing changes in their lives – in order to secure sustainable operation of the systems as well as to deliver effective development impacts<ref>Liu, Y., & Bah, Z. (2021). Enabling development impact of solar mini-grids through the community engagement: Evidence from rural Sierra Leone. Energy Policy, 154, 112294. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112294</nowiki></ref><ref name=":3">Tomei, J., Cronin, J., Arias, H. D. A., Machado, S. C., Palacios, M. F. M., Ortiz, Y. M. T., Cuesta, Y. E. B., Lemus, R. P., López, W. M., & Anandarajah, G. (2020). Forgotten spaces: How reliability, affordability and engagement shape the outcomes of last-mile electrification in Chocó, Colombia. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, 101302. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101302</nowiki></ref>.
  
−
'''Securing communication and engagement'''
+
One crucial issue is the building and maintaining of trustful communication. This is key in order to build proper understanding of the needs of the users and to ensure that all the actors involved or affected by the electrification initiative understand the project objectives, potential benefits as well as its limitations, i.e. for proper management of expectations<ref name=":1" />. This implies for instance securing mutual understanding about important design parameters such as tariffs, the costs and rules for connection, the power or the amount of energy available to single users, the schedule of the energy provision, the operation and management arrangements<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":3" />.
  
−
The process of implementing a new local energy system implies introducing a series of changes in the physical and immaterial aspects of the lives of the local population. It is essential to engage local actors in all the phases of project development – i.e. in the process of introducing changes in their lives – in order to secure sustainable operation of the systems as well as to deliver effective development impacts (Liu & Bah, 2021; Tomei et al., 2020).
+
Local factors influencing such design parameters can be difficult to determine ex-ante and might become apparent first after the implementation or even the operation of the systems has started. It is also difficult to foresee how the practices of the users will evolve once the use of electricity is integrated in their lives. Thus, maintaining communication channels and – more generally – engagement with the users can be crucial also for managing the future evolution of the systems<ref>Batidzirai, B. ''et al.'' (2021) ‘Towards people-private-public partnerships: An integrated community engagement model for capturing energy access needs’, ''Energy Research & Social Science'', 74, p. 101975. Available at: <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101975</nowiki>.</ref><ref name=":3" /><ref name=":0" />.
  
−
One crucial issue is the building and maintaining of trustful communication. This is key in order to build proper understanding of the needs of the users and to ensure that all the actors involved or affected by the electrification initiative understand the project objectives, potential benefits as well as its limitations, i.e. for proper management of expectations (Eder et al., 2015). This implies for instance securing mutual understanding about important design parameters such as tariffs, the costs and rules for connection, the power or the amount of energy available to single users, the schedule of the energy provision, the operation and management arrangements (Eder et al., 2015; Tomei et al., 2020).
+
The local population served can also have additional roles in the electrification scheme, i.e. beyond being the users of the services and the customers of the supply company. The local population can be actively involved in several phases of the project development - including the construction, the operation and the management of the systems<ref>Höffken, J.I. (2016) ‘Demystification and localization in the adoption of micro-hydro technology: Insights from India’, ''Energy Research & Social Science'', 22, pp. 172–182. Available at: <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.09.002</nowiki>.</ref><ref>Madriz-Vargas, R., Bruce, A. and Watt, M. (2018) ‘The future of Community Renewable Energy for electricity access in rural Central America’, ''Energy Research & Social Science'', 35, pp. 118–131. Available at: <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.015</nowiki>.</ref><ref>Katre, A., Tozzi, A. and Bhattacharyya, S. (2019) ‘Sustainability of community-owned mini-grids: evidence from India’, ''Energy, Sustainability and Society'', 9(1), p. 2. Available at: <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0185-9</nowiki>.</ref><ref>Bloem, S., Swilling, M. and Koranteng, K. (2021) ‘Taking energy democracy to the streets: Socio-technical learning, institutional dynamism, and integration in South African community energy projects’, ''Energy Research & Social Science'', 72, p. 101906. Available at: <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101906</nowiki>.</ref>.
  
−
Local factors influencing such design parameters can be difficult to determine ex-ante and might become apparent first after the implementation or even the operation of the systems has started. It is also difficult to foresee how the practices of the users will evolve once the use of electricity is integrated in their lives. Thus, maintaining communication channels and – more generally – engagement with the users can be crucial also for managing the future evolution of the systems (Tomei et al., 2020; „Towards People-Private-Public Partnerships“, 2021; Ulsrud et al., 2015).
+
==== '''Addressing structures of inequality''' ====
 +
It becomes increasingly important to view the needs and constraints of different groups through an energy justice framework. Studies find a strong risk of implementing rural electrification interventions that do not represent a sustainable solution to the structural drivers of energy poverty and do not have the capacity to address social inequalities (Samarakoon, 2020, Monyei et al 2018). This also includes interventions that are addressing productive uses. For example, Sahrakorpi and Bandi (2021) find that programmes promoting use of rice husk processing appliances among women in rural North India led to formal employment opportunities, but their presence did not secure long-lasting women’s empowerment.  
  
−
The local population served can also have additional roles in the electrification scheme, i.e. beyond being the users of the services and the customers of the supply company. The local population can be actively involved in several phases of the project development - including the construction, the operation and the management of the systems (Madriz-Vargas, Bruce, and Watt 2018; Bloem, Swilling, and Koranteng 2021; Ulsrud et al. 2018; Katre and Tozzi 2019; Höffken 2016).
+
==== '''Community-based models''' ====
  
−
'''Addressing structures of inequality'''
+
==Existing Tools==
  
−
It becomes increasingly important to view the needs and constraints of different groups through an energy justice framework. Studies find a strong risk of implementing rural electrification interventions that do not represent a sustainable solution to the structural drivers of energy poverty and do not have the capacity to address social inequalities (Samarakoon, 2020, Monyei et al 2018). This also includes interventions that are addressing productive uses. For example, Sahrakorpi and Bandi (2021) find that programmes promoting use of rice husk processing appliances among women in rural North India led to formal employment opportunities, but their presence did not secure long-lasting women’s empowerment.  
+
==== Ruralsenses tool ====
 +
The tool helps to understand individual preferences and values linked to the use of energy. The User-Perceived-Value approach “allows us to understand what is important to local community members and to effectively link this to project design. By ensuring that projects target what local community members truly value, the success rate of interventions can be increased”.  The development of the tool is based on previous research work that has been published <ref name=":2" /><ref>Hirmer, S., & Guthrie, P. (2016). Identifying the needs of communities in rural Uganda: A method for determining the ‘User-Perceived Value’ of rural electrification initiatives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 66, 476–486. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.037</nowiki></ref>. It is important to note that this tool is used as the conceptual background for the qualitative data collection underway in PeopleSuN WP2.  
  
−
'''Community-based models'''
+
==== Powering Renewable Energy Opportunities (PREO) Knowledge Hub ====
 +
The hub is an open-access library collecting information related to productive use of energy. The published resources aim to close critical knowledge gaps in sub-Saharan Africa’s PUE market, helping to uptake PUE, stimulate economies and create jobs. The knowledge hub is clustered in various subject areas like case studies, mini-grids, agri-processing, cold-storage and many more<ref>PREO. (2022). Knowledge Hub. PREO Powering Renewable Energy Opportunities. <nowiki>https://www.preo.org/category/knowledge-hub/</nowiki></ref>.
  
−
==Existing Tools==  
+
==== Local Solutions Lab by Clean Technology Hub ====
−
''[Enter existing tools text]''
+
The Clean Technology Hub (CTH), a Nigerian organisation and a partner of PeopleSuN, applied an innovative approach to identifying community needs and triggering change. The “Local Solutions Lab” (LSL) concept (CTH, 2019) aims to develop community-driven and bottom-up local solutions for sustainable development through a collaborative deep dive into challenges of local stakeholders and opportunities<ref>CTH. (2019). Enabling Small Scale Solutions Growth—Local Solutions Lab. <nowiki>https://bit.ly/LocalSolns</nowiki></ref>. This experience will be featured in the WP5 toolbox as a case study, summing up the application of the LSL in Kaduna (North West Nigeria) and Anambra (South West Nigeria) as well as some of the impacts it has had since, in particular in the development of energy-related solutions.
  
 
==Bibliography==  
 
==Bibliography==  

Revision as of 14:08, 20 March 2023



Introduction

Designing electricity delivery models for people living in poverty begins with an understanding of the opportunities and constraints arising from the end users’ specific socio-economic and cultural context. These opportunities and constraints may be related to energy but also to other, non-energy factors. This dimension has a broad scope and touches on many of the subsequent dimensions of the toolbox. This section will firstly provide some guiding principles by reviewing some of the broader concepts and secondly hint towards existing tools and resources.

Definitions

[Enter definitions text]

Challenges

[Enter challenges text]

Guiding Principles

There is an increasing amount of evidence that underlines the importance of taking into account the socio-cultural, economic and political dimensions of the specific local contexts in which off-grid energy interventions take place[1][2]. The importance of these contextual dimensions can be roughly categorized into three issues: a) understanding needs, b) securing engagement and c) addressing structures of inequality.

Understanding needs

When developing an electrification intervention, understanding aspirations and values of the people that get access to the electricity service is as important as solving the economic challenges (e.g. the accessibility and the financial ability to buy the required appliances). There is a diversity of benefits that electricity users can perceive as valuable, such as business opportunity, the elimination of labour intensive tasks, preservation of health, security, the ability to acquire knowledge, and comfort, among others. Understanding and properly addressing these context specific values of a population is an important factor to ensure communities’ endorsement to electrification interventions [3][4]. The potential effects of access to electricity on practices linked to business activities of the served population are of particular interest in the design and implementation of electrification interventions. These types of effects are often gathered under the term “productive use of electricity” (PUE).

Securing communication and engagement

The process of implementing a new local energy system implies introducing a series of changes in the physical and immaterial aspects of the lives of the local population. It is essential to engage local actors in all the phases of project development – i.e. in the process of introducing changes in their lives – in order to secure sustainable operation of the systems as well as to deliver effective development impacts[5][6].

One crucial issue is the building and maintaining of trustful communication. This is key in order to build proper understanding of the needs of the users and to ensure that all the actors involved or affected by the electrification initiative understand the project objectives, potential benefits as well as its limitations, i.e. for proper management of expectations[3]. This implies for instance securing mutual understanding about important design parameters such as tariffs, the costs and rules for connection, the power or the amount of energy available to single users, the schedule of the energy provision, the operation and management arrangements[3][6].

Local factors influencing such design parameters can be difficult to determine ex-ante and might become apparent first after the implementation or even the operation of the systems has started. It is also difficult to foresee how the practices of the users will evolve once the use of electricity is integrated in their lives. Thus, maintaining communication channels and – more generally – engagement with the users can be crucial also for managing the future evolution of the systems[7][6][2].

The local population served can also have additional roles in the electrification scheme, i.e. beyond being the users of the services and the customers of the supply company. The local population can be actively involved in several phases of the project development - including the construction, the operation and the management of the systems[8][9][10][11].

Addressing structures of inequality

It becomes increasingly important to view the needs and constraints of different groups through an energy justice framework. Studies find a strong risk of implementing rural electrification interventions that do not represent a sustainable solution to the structural drivers of energy poverty and do not have the capacity to address social inequalities (Samarakoon, 2020, Monyei et al 2018). This also includes interventions that are addressing productive uses. For example, Sahrakorpi and Bandi (2021) find that programmes promoting use of rice husk processing appliances among women in rural North India led to formal employment opportunities, but their presence did not secure long-lasting women’s empowerment.

Community-based models

Existing Tools

Ruralsenses tool

The tool helps to understand individual preferences and values linked to the use of energy. The User-Perceived-Value approach “allows us to understand what is important to local community members and to effectively link this to project design. By ensuring that projects target what local community members truly value, the success rate of interventions can be increased”.  The development of the tool is based on previous research work that has been published [4][12]. It is important to note that this tool is used as the conceptual background for the qualitative data collection underway in PeopleSuN WP2.

Powering Renewable Energy Opportunities (PREO) Knowledge Hub

The hub is an open-access library collecting information related to productive use of energy. The published resources aim to close critical knowledge gaps in sub-Saharan Africa’s PUE market, helping to uptake PUE, stimulate economies and create jobs. The knowledge hub is clustered in various subject areas like case studies, mini-grids, agri-processing, cold-storage and many more[13].

Local Solutions Lab by Clean Technology Hub

The Clean Technology Hub (CTH), a Nigerian organisation and a partner of PeopleSuN, applied an innovative approach to identifying community needs and triggering change. The “Local Solutions Lab” (LSL) concept (CTH, 2019) aims to develop community-driven and bottom-up local solutions for sustainable development through a collaborative deep dive into challenges of local stakeholders and opportunities[14]. This experience will be featured in the WP5 toolbox as a case study, summing up the application of the LSL in Kaduna (North West Nigeria) and Anambra (South West Nigeria) as well as some of the impacts it has had since, in particular in the development of energy-related solutions.

Bibliography

[Bibliography will be listed automatically, after adding references to the appropriate paragraphs above]

  1. ↑ Ockwell, D. et al. (2018) ‘The uptake and diffusion of solar power in Africa: Socio-cultural and political insights on a rapidly emerging socio-technical transition’, Energy Research & Social Science, 44, pp. 122–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.033.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Ulsrud, K., Winther, T., Palit, D., & Rohracher, H. (2015). Village-level solar power in Africa: Accelerating access to electricity services through a socio-technical design in Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science, 5, 34–44. https://doi.org/ka
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Eder, J. M., Mutsaerts, C. F., & Sriwannawit, P. (2015). Mini-grids and renewable energy in rural Africa: How diffusion theory explains adoption of electricity in Uganda. Energy Research & Social Science, 5, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.014
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Hirmer, S., & Guthrie, P. (2017). The benefits of energy appliances in the off-grid energy sector based on seven off-grid initiatives in rural Uganda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.152
  5. ↑ Liu, Y., & Bah, Z. (2021). Enabling development impact of solar mini-grids through the community engagement: Evidence from rural Sierra Leone. Energy Policy, 154, 112294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112294
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Tomei, J., Cronin, J., Arias, H. D. A., Machado, S. C., Palacios, M. F. M., Ortiz, Y. M. T., Cuesta, Y. E. B., Lemus, R. P., López, W. M., & Anandarajah, G. (2020). Forgotten spaces: How reliability, affordability and engagement shape the outcomes of last-mile electrification in Chocó, Colombia. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101302
  7. ↑ Batidzirai, B. et al. (2021) ‘Towards people-private-public partnerships: An integrated community engagement model for capturing energy access needs’, Energy Research & Social Science, 74, p. 101975. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101975.
  8. ↑ Höffken, J.I. (2016) ‘Demystification and localization in the adoption of micro-hydro technology: Insights from India’, Energy Research & Social Science, 22, pp. 172–182. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.09.002.
  9. ↑ Madriz-Vargas, R., Bruce, A. and Watt, M. (2018) ‘The future of Community Renewable Energy for electricity access in rural Central America’, Energy Research & Social Science, 35, pp. 118–131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.015.
  10. ↑ Katre, A., Tozzi, A. and Bhattacharyya, S. (2019) ‘Sustainability of community-owned mini-grids: evidence from India’, Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(1), p. 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0185-9.
  11. ↑ Bloem, S., Swilling, M. and Koranteng, K. (2021) ‘Taking energy democracy to the streets: Socio-technical learning, institutional dynamism, and integration in South African community energy projects’, Energy Research & Social Science, 72, p. 101906. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101906.
  12. ↑ Hirmer, S., & Guthrie, P. (2016). Identifying the needs of communities in rural Uganda: A method for determining the ‘User-Perceived Value’ of rural electrification initiatives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 66, 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.037
  13. ↑ PREO. (2022). Knowledge Hub. PREO Powering Renewable Energy Opportunities. https://www.preo.org/category/knowledge-hub/
  14. ↑ CTH. (2019). Enabling Small Scale Solutions Growth—Local Solutions Lab. https://bit.ly/LocalSolns
Retrieved from "https://staging.energypedia.info/index.php?title=Understand_User_Needs&oldid=401914"