Knowledge fuels change
For over a decade, Energypedia has shared free, reliable energy expertise with the world.
We’re now facing a serious funding gap.
Help keep this platform alive — your donation, big or small, truly matters!
Thank you for your support
Difference between revisions of "National Approaches to Electrification – Review of Options"
From energypedia
***** (***** | *****) m |
***** (***** | *****) m (Reverted edits by Johanna von Behaim (*****) to last revision by *****) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | < | + | = Content<br/> = |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | #Introduction<br/> | |
| − | + | #What are National Electrification Approaches? | |
| − | </ | + | #How to use this Review tool |
| + | #Categorization of National Electrification Approaches | ||
| + | #Category Dashboard and information on categories | ||
| + | #Example Table and Country Case Studies<br/> | ||
| + | #*Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia,Vietnam<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Download<br/> = | ||
| + | |||
| + | *The tool is a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: [[File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|center|180px|National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|alt=National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Key Messages<br/> = | ||
| + | |||
| + | *'''Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches (NEA) to be presented and compared systematically'''<br/> | ||
| + | *'''NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas''' | ||
| + | *'''There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context''' | ||
| + | *'''NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase'''<br/> | ||
| + | *'''Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.'''<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Further Information<br/> = | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Reference = | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Authors: Mary Willcox, Dean Cooper | ||
| + | *EUEI PDF, EnDev, Practical Action | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
[[Category:Rural_Electrification]] | [[Category:Rural_Electrification]] | ||
| Line 27: | Line 56: | ||
[[Category:Mali]] | [[Category:Mali]] | ||
[[Category:Nepal]] | [[Category:Nepal]] | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 14:36, 18 June 2018
Content
- Introduction
- What are National Electrification Approaches?
- How to use this Review tool
- Categorization of National Electrification Approaches
- Category Dashboard and information on categories
- Example Table and Country Case Studies
- Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia,Vietnam
- Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia,Vietnam
Download
- The tool is a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx
Key Messages
- Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches (NEA) to be presented and compared systematically
- NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas
- There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context
- NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase
- Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.
Further Information
Reference
- Authors: Mary Willcox, Dean Cooper
- EUEI PDF, EnDev, Practical Action
