Difference between revisions of "Feed-in Tariffs (FIT)"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | Varianten moeglich in Bezug auf: | + | Varianten moeglich in Bezug auf: |
− | *Fristigkeit | + | *Fristigkeit |
− | *Preishoehe, Preisprofil ueber die Laufzeit | + | *Preishoehe, Preisprofil ueber die Laufzeit |
*Preisfestsetzungsprozesse (Tarifierung per Gesetz, per Regulierung, durch Regulierungsbehoerde..) | *Preisfestsetzungsprozesse (Tarifierung per Gesetz, per Regulierung, durch Regulierungsbehoerde..) | ||
*gesetzliche oder vertragliche Basis (oeffentlich rechtlich, oder privatrechtlich) | *gesetzliche oder vertragliche Basis (oeffentlich rechtlich, oder privatrechtlich) | ||
− | *Herkunft der Praemie (Umlage - auf Stromkunden- und Formen; Staatsbudget, Sonderhaushalte, Dritte, EZ?) | + | *Herkunft der Praemie (Umlage - auf Stromkunden- und Formen; Staatsbudget, Sonderhaushalte, Dritte, EZ?) |
*Gueltigkeit, Differenzierung und eventuelle Beschraenkungen | *Gueltigkeit, Differenzierung und eventuelle Beschraenkungen | ||
*nach Technologien (Wind, SolarPV, CSP...) | *nach Technologien (Wind, SolarPV, CSP...) | ||
− | *nach Kapazitaet der Anlagen | + | *nach Kapazitaet der Anlagen |
*jaehrliche Quoten | *jaehrliche Quoten | ||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
*Arne Klein, Benjamin Pfluger, Anne Held, Mario Ragwitz (Fraunhofer ISI), Gustav Resch, Thomas Faber (EEG); Evaluation of different feed-in tariff design options – Best practice paper for the International Feed-In Cooperation; A research project funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU); 2nd edition, Karlsruhe, October 2008 | *Arne Klein, Benjamin Pfluger, Anne Held, Mario Ragwitz (Fraunhofer ISI), Gustav Resch, Thomas Faber (EEG); Evaluation of different feed-in tariff design options – Best practice paper for the International Feed-In Cooperation; A research project funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU); 2nd edition, Karlsruhe, October 2008 | ||
*John Besant-Jones, Bernard Tenenbaum, Prasad Tallapragada (ESMAP / World Bank); Regulatory Review of Power Purchase Agreements: A Proposed Benchmarking Methodology; Washington DC, October 2008 | *John Besant-Jones, Bernard Tenenbaum, Prasad Tallapragada (ESMAP / World Bank); Regulatory Review of Power Purchase Agreements: A Proposed Benchmarking Methodology; Washington DC, October 2008 | ||
− | *DB Climate Change Advisors; Greenpaper GET FiT Program - Global Energy Transfer Feed-in Tariffs for Developing Countries; London April 2010 | + | *DB Climate Change Advisors; Greenpaper GET FiT Program - Global Energy Transfer Feed-in Tariffs for Developing Countries; London April 2010 |
+ | *[http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/44849.pdf NREL Feed-in Policy Guidelines] | ||
[[Category:Financing,_promotion_schemes_and_subsidies]] | [[Category:Financing,_promotion_schemes_and_subsidies]] |
Revision as of 11:19, 25 August 2010
Feed-in tariffs (FIT) are fixed rates paid to producers of electricity for feeding it into the grid. Power purchasing agreements (PPA) are bilateral contracts between the producer and the grid / system operator.
FITs are typically used to incentivize the production of electricity on the basis of renewable energy (RE-FIT). FIT set a price, other incentive schemes set a quantity (quota regulation), markets react accordingly (...)
FIT allows decentralised electricity production by private entities (i.e. independent power producers, IPPs).
Selling electricity into a (national) grid is often strongly restricted. FIT allows such with fixed procedures for a fixed price. It thereby creates reliable conditions for potential investors. This is specially demanded for small power production facilities. Those can provide decentralized electricity production and effective use of available resources (e.g. hydro-, wind-, biomass-, thermal heat or solar power plants).
Design options
The following design options exist:
- Purchase obligation
- Stepped tariff
- Tariff digression
- Premium option
- Equal burden sharing
- Forecast obligation
Varianten moeglich in Bezug auf:
- Fristigkeit
- Preishoehe, Preisprofil ueber die Laufzeit
- Preisfestsetzungsprozesse (Tarifierung per Gesetz, per Regulierung, durch Regulierungsbehoerde..)
- gesetzliche oder vertragliche Basis (oeffentlich rechtlich, oder privatrechtlich)
- Herkunft der Praemie (Umlage - auf Stromkunden- und Formen; Staatsbudget, Sonderhaushalte, Dritte, EZ?)
- Gueltigkeit, Differenzierung und eventuelle Beschraenkungen
- nach Technologien (Wind, SolarPV, CSP...)
- nach Kapazitaet der Anlagen
- jaehrliche Quoten
Experiences
Germany has made good experience with feed-in-tariffs. Nevertheless it is necessary to analyze the situation in each country to find out the best way to improve renewable energy power generation under the given framework set. The feed-in-tariff works well with an extended grid system. Therefore it will have to be combined with other measures or replaced by other options for a rural electrification strategy, where there often isn’t any grid at all.
Germany
Germany started supporting renewable energies in 1991 with the first legally binding act that enabled producers to feed their renewable energies into the grid. In 2001 the first version of the now called Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) entered into force and was designed to provide an adapted tariff to the different renewable energy systems in dependence to their status of technology development and prices for production of power and to ensure compliance with sustainability criteria. The latest version of this act entered into force in January 2009. It is the most important instrument and driving force in the expansion of renewable energies in the electricity sector because it provides investment securities.
How does the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) work?
Basically, the EEG obligates that all generators of electricity are guaranteed access to the integrated electrical grid to a fixed price on base of a feed-in tariff scheme for the time span of 20 years beginning at the point of installation.
The exact amount of the feed-in tariff depends on the starting date of feeding in and drops by a fixed percentage each year. This encourages technological improvements and cost decreases (degression rate). The prices furthermore vary with the capacity installed, amount of energy generated by the producer, the type of renewable energy source (Landfill gas, sewage treatment plant gas, mine gas, biomass, geothermal, energy from solar radiation (solar photovoltaic, solar thermal), hydropower and wind power) and the type of site where the power is generated (e.g.Wind: on shore or off share, e.g. solar PV: roof or field).
For solar PV a tarif for own consumption is in place, too. If an operator of a PV plant consumes its own power the utility pay a certain tarif to the owner for this power. In 2010 this tarif is in the range of 0,13-0,15€/kWh ( feed in tarif appro. 0,30-0,35€/kWh, average grid price for househlds app.0,18-0,21€/kWh).
The additional costs that arise are distributed equally among all energy utilities in Germany (off-budget incentive scheme). They in turn pass the costs down to the end consumer, according to their demand on electricity (cross subsidisation).
Therefore, the fixed prices are intended to level costs for energy derived from renewable energy sources with energy from traditional resources.
The fixed-tariffs give further more security to providers of electricity and stimulate investments into the sector. It creates an equal level “playing field” for renewable energy technologies that also enables small and medium sized producers to participate in the energy market and to develop new and innovative solutions.
Therefore, the EEG it is especially favouring small producers in decentralised (grid connected) areas to invest into renewable energies. The individual support for every single source of renewable energies furthermore encourages the decentralized approach.
Expansion of renewable energies in the power generation sector: Since the beginning of the support, wind power has developed strongly and hydropower has been maintained at a high level. A similar boom occurred in the use of biomass, photovoltaic and geothermal energy.
Morocco
Morocco is a country with a huge dependency on the import of fossil energy of up to 95%. But the country has a high potential for renewable energy: if this potential was exploited, then Morocco could produce twice as much as the required amount of energy and thus also tackle the obstacle of the low electrification rate which is 15% or lower in rural areas.
• Performing surveys and measurements to determine the wind potential
• Elaboration and improvement of conditions for feeding wind-generated electricity into power grids Creation and consolidation of energy-sector framework conditions for renewable energy resources
• Fostering knowledge among experts and managers in private and state-owned institutions to assess the wind energy potential, to plan wind energy projects and to improve the energy policy framework for renewable energies
- The project advises the Moroccan Ministry of Energy, Mines, Water and the Environment on developing and implementing the nation’s Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Act and secondary regulation in the form of, for example, ordinances and decrees.
- Furthermore support to its partner organisation, Morocco’s Centre for Development of Renewable Energy (CDER), in its transformation process is provided.
- Efforts to develop regional utilisation strategies for renewable energy sources and energy efficiency in selected regions of Morocco represent a further aspect of the project.
- Through the cooperation with industry and research partners, like for instance the Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research or the German Aerospace Center the project supports the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency.
- Results achieved so far: (1) Training events have improved the technical know-how of the partner organisation, particularly with regard to energy efficiency; (2) Morocco’s Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Act is on track to be adopted by Moroccan Parliament in 2009.
Chile
A second priority area is the removal of structural market constraints hindering the rapid expansion of renewables in Chile. These include, besides lack of knowledge about energy resources and their geographical distribution, lack of experience with planning and approval procedures and with grid connection.
Brazil
1. FITs are politically not feasible in Brazil.
2. Due to high retail electricity rates it is expected that grid parity will be attained in 5-7 years.
3. The regulator is repsonsible for tariff adjustments.
Feed-in tariff funds
Overview of proposed feed-in tariff funds
Name of organization | Capitalization / Source of funds | Governance Structure | Target / Services provided | Annotation |
Deutsche Bank - Global Energy Transfer Feed-in tariffs for Developing Countries (GET FiT) | carbon credits, ODA, private capital | global | renewable energy and off-grid premium (incremental costs); policy advise; project preparation |
GET FiT is proposed by Deutsche Bank Climate Change Advisors. Stage: Greenpaper (study), available on http://www.dbcca.com/research |
Further Reading
- Arne Klein, Benjamin Pfluger, Anne Held, Mario Ragwitz (Fraunhofer ISI), Gustav Resch, Thomas Faber (EEG); Evaluation of different feed-in tariff design options – Best practice paper for the International Feed-In Cooperation; A research project funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU); 2nd edition, Karlsruhe, October 2008
- John Besant-Jones, Bernard Tenenbaum, Prasad Tallapragada (ESMAP / World Bank); Regulatory Review of Power Purchase Agreements: A Proposed Benchmarking Methodology; Washington DC, October 2008
- DB Climate Change Advisors; Greenpaper GET FiT Program - Global Energy Transfer Feed-in Tariffs for Developing Countries; London April 2010
- NREL Feed-in Policy Guidelines