Difference between revisions of "Solar Home System (SHS) - Climate Protection"

From energypedia
***** (***** | *****)
***** (***** | *****)
Line 1: Line 1:
= GHG reduction potential of SHS =
+
= GHG reduction potential of SHS =
  
*<span>"Savings of 9 tonnes of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions within a 20-year period of use of one single 50 Wp SHS";
+
*<span>"Savings of 9 tonnes of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions within a 20-year period of use of one single 50 Wp SHS"; </span><span>=&gt; '''0.45 t CO2/year<ref>Posorski, Rolf et al.: Does the use of Solar Home Systems (SHS) contribute to climate protection?, 2002, Renewable Energy, Volume 28, Number 7, June 2003, pp. 1061-1080 (20).</ref>'''</span>  
</span><span>=&gt; '''0.45 t CO2/year<ref>Posorski, Rolf et al.: Does the use of Solar Home Systems (SHS) contribute to climate protection?, 2002, Renewable Energy, Volume 28, Number 7, June 2003, pp. 1061-1080 (20).</ref>'''</span>
+
*<span>"Typicale SHS of 10-50 Wp will directly displace roughly '''0.15-0.30 tons of CO2''' per year through fuel substitutions mostly of kerosene."<ref>REPP: Steven Kaufman: Rural Electrification with Solar Energy as a Climate Protection Strategy, Research Report No. 9, 2000.</ref></span>  
*<span>"Typicale SHS of 10-50 Wp will directly displace roughly '''0.15-0.30 tons of CO2''' per year through fuel substitutions mostly of kerosene."<ref>REPP: Steven Kaufman: Rural Electrification with Solar Energy as a Climate Protection Strategy, Research Report No. 9, 2000.</ref></span>
+
*<span>"</span><span>During a previous analysis of 8 case studies, it was found roughly '''0.25 tons of CO2''' per average system of 44 Wp per year would represent a conservative but reasonable global value. […] 70% of the analysed emission reductions were actually higher than 250 kg."<ref>Martens et al. (2001): Towards a streamlined CDM process for Solar Home Systems.</ref></span>&lt;span /&gt;
*<span>"</span><span>During a previous analysis of 8 case studies, it was found roughly '''0.25 tons of CO2''' per average system of 44 Wp per year would represent a conservative but reasonable global value. […] 70% of the analysed emission reductions were actually higher than 250 kg."<ref>Martens et al. (2001): Towards a streamlined CDM process for Solar Home Systems.</ref></span><span />
 
  
 
= Further Reading =
 
= Further Reading =

Revision as of 13:55, 28 June 2010

GHG reduction potential of SHS

  • "Savings of 9 tonnes of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions within a 20-year period of use of one single 50 Wp SHS"; => 0.45 t CO2/year[1]
  • "Typicale SHS of 10-50 Wp will directly displace roughly 0.15-0.30 tons of CO2 per year through fuel substitutions mostly of kerosene."[2]
  • "During a previous analysis of 8 case studies, it was found roughly 0.25 tons of CO2 per average system of 44 Wp per year would represent a conservative but reasonable global value. […] 70% of the analysed emission reductions were actually higher than 250 kg."[3]<span />

Further Reading

Posorski, Rolf et al.: Does the use of Solar Home Systems (SHS) contribute to climate protection?, 2002, Renewable Energy, Volume 28, Number 7, June 2003, pp. 1061-1080 (20).

REPP: Steven Kaufman: Rural Electrification with Solar Energy as a Climate Protection Strategy, Research Report No. 9, 2000.

Martens et al. (2001): Towards a streamlined CDM process for Solar Home Systems.

References

  1. Posorski, Rolf et al.: Does the use of Solar Home Systems (SHS) contribute to climate protection?, 2002, Renewable Energy, Volume 28, Number 7, June 2003, pp. 1061-1080 (20).
  2. REPP: Steven Kaufman: Rural Electrification with Solar Energy as a Climate Protection Strategy, Research Report No. 9, 2000.
  3. Martens et al. (2001): Towards a streamlined CDM process for Solar Home Systems.



⇒ Back to Solar Section