Difference between revisions of "Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol (HSAP)"
***** (***** | *****) |
***** (***** | *****) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Portal:Hydro|►Back to Hydro Portal]]<br/> | [[Portal:Hydro|►Back to Hydro Portal]]<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
The assessment tools are used as '''a framework to produce a sustainability profile '''for a hydropower project. In so doing, multiple stakeholders can become better informed on the sustainability profile of a project, and develop strategies to address any weaknesses. | The assessment tools are used as '''a framework to produce a sustainability profile '''for a hydropower project. In so doing, multiple stakeholders can become better informed on the sustainability profile of a project, and develop strategies to address any weaknesses. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
= History = | = History = | ||
| − | The Protocol is the result of intensive work from 2008 to 2010 by the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum, a multi-stakeholder body with representatives from social and environmental NGOs (Oxfam, The Nature Conservancy, Transparency International, WWF); governments (China, Germany [as an observer, represented by GIZ], Iceland, Norway, Zambia); commercial and development banks (Equator Principles Financial Institutions Group, The World Bank [as an observer]); hydropower operators and developers (Statkraft, Hydro Tasmania, and others); and hydropower consultants, contractors and suppliers (Voith Hydro, Hydrofocus, Hydro Equipment Association, and others) . The development process of the Protocol involved field trials in 16 countries, across 6 continents, and stakeholder engagement with nearly 2,000 people in 28 countries.<br/> | + | The Protocol is the result of intensive work from 2008 to 2010 by the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum, a multi-stakeholder body with representatives from social and environmental NGOs (Oxfam, The Nature Conservancy, Transparency International, WWF); governments (China, Germany [as an observer, represented by GIZ], Iceland, Norway, Zambia); commercial and development banks (Equator Principles Financial Institutions Group, The World Bank [as an observer]); hydropower operators and developers (Statkraft, Hydro Tasmania, and others); and hydropower consultants, contractors and suppliers (SinoHydro, Voith Hydro, Hydrofocus, Hydro Equipment Association, and others) . The development process of the Protocol involved field trials in 16 countries, across 6 continents, and stakeholder engagement with nearly 2,000 people in 28 countries.<br/> |
The Protocol was officially launched in Brazil in June 2011 and is governed by a multi-stakeholder council, comprising a governance committee and a management entity, the latter residing within IHA. In May 2013 the Transitional Governance Committee has been replaced by the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Council as a permanent steering entity.<br/> | The Protocol was officially launched in Brazil in June 2011 and is governed by a multi-stakeholder council, comprising a governance committee and a management entity, the latter residing within IHA. In May 2013 the Transitional Governance Committee has been replaced by the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Council as a permanent steering entity.<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | = Status (early 2015)<br/> = | ||
| + | With more than 30 assessments implemented so far (ten of them published [http://www.hydrosustainability.org/Protocol-Assessments.aspx here]), and a long list of upcoming ones for 2015 and 2016, uptake of the Protocol is positive. A valuable asset is its true multi-stakeholder nature, with practically all interest groups represented in the Protocol's design and management processes. The shared aim of all involved parties is to facilitate 'better hydropower', and the Protocol presents a practical tool to assess and discuss what 'good' or 'better' means to each of the involved interest groups, and to identify ways for projects to 'improve'. <br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The most recent review of all existing international social and environmental safeguards for hydropower projects ("[http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17517IIED.pdf Watered down?]", Skinner and Haas 2014) concludes that "[...] the HSAP represents the best currently available measuring stick for respect for WCD [[[World_Commission_on_Dams_(WCD)_Report|World Commission on Dams]]] provisions in individual projects." (p.44) <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 44: | ||
= Download<br/> = | = Download<br/> = | ||
► [http://www.hydrosustainability.org/Document-Library.aspx Download all documents relating to the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol]<br/> | ► [http://www.hydrosustainability.org/Document-Library.aspx Download all documents relating to the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol]<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ► [http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17517IIED.pdf "Watered down? A review of social and environmental safeguards for large dam projects". Jamie Skinner and Lawrence J. Haas, IIED 2014]<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 58: | ||
*[http://www.hydrosustainability.org/ Homepage: Hydropower Sustainability] | *[http://www.hydrosustainability.org/ Homepage: Hydropower Sustainability] | ||
*[[Portal:Hydro|Hydro Portal on energypedia]] | *[[Portal:Hydro|Hydro Portal on energypedia]] | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 66: | ||
= References = | = References = | ||
| − | |||
| + | *[http://www.unep.org/dams/WCD/report/WCD_DAMS report.pdf "A New Framework for Decision-Making: The Report of the World Commission on Dams". World Commission on Dams 2000]<br/> | ||
| + | *[http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17517IIED.pdf "Watered down? A review of social and environmental safeguards for large dam projects". Jamie Skinner and Lawrence J. Haas, IIED 2014]<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Hydro_(large)]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Micro_Hydro]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Sustainability]] | ||
[[Category:Hydro]] | [[Category:Hydro]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 09:05, 10 February 2015
Overview
The Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol is an enhanced sustainability assessment tool which is being used to measure and guide performance in the hydropower sector.
The Protocol can be used at any stage of hydropower development, from the very earliest planning stages, right through to operation. It has been designed to work on projects and facilities anywhere in the world. To assess the sustainability of hydropower projects at all stages of development, the Protocol comprises five documents – a Background document and four assessment tools for the different stages of the project life cycle: Early Stage, Preparation, Implementation (= construction), and Operation.
Assessments rely on objective evidence to create a sustainability profile against some 20 topics depending on the relevant stage, and covering all aspects of sustainability.The Protocol topics cover the three pillars of sustainability: social, economic, and environmental, and include issues such as downstream flow regimes, indigenous peoples, biodiversity, infrastructure safety, financial structuring, economic benefits, options assessment, resettlement, water quality, erosion, and sedimentation.
The assessment tools are used as a framework to produce a sustainability profile for a hydropower project. In so doing, multiple stakeholders can become better informed on the sustainability profile of a project, and develop strategies to address any weaknesses.
History
The Protocol is the result of intensive work from 2008 to 2010 by the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum, a multi-stakeholder body with representatives from social and environmental NGOs (Oxfam, The Nature Conservancy, Transparency International, WWF); governments (China, Germany [as an observer, represented by GIZ], Iceland, Norway, Zambia); commercial and development banks (Equator Principles Financial Institutions Group, The World Bank [as an observer]); hydropower operators and developers (Statkraft, Hydro Tasmania, and others); and hydropower consultants, contractors and suppliers (SinoHydro, Voith Hydro, Hydrofocus, Hydro Equipment Association, and others) . The development process of the Protocol involved field trials in 16 countries, across 6 continents, and stakeholder engagement with nearly 2,000 people in 28 countries.
The Protocol was officially launched in Brazil in June 2011 and is governed by a multi-stakeholder council, comprising a governance committee and a management entity, the latter residing within IHA. In May 2013 the Transitional Governance Committee has been replaced by the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Council as a permanent steering entity.
Status (early 2015)
With more than 30 assessments implemented so far (ten of them published here), and a long list of upcoming ones for 2015 and 2016, uptake of the Protocol is positive. A valuable asset is its true multi-stakeholder nature, with practically all interest groups represented in the Protocol's design and management processes. The shared aim of all involved parties is to facilitate 'better hydropower', and the Protocol presents a practical tool to assess and discuss what 'good' or 'better' means to each of the involved interest groups, and to identify ways for projects to 'improve'.
The most recent review of all existing international social and environmental safeguards for hydropower projects ("Watered down?", Skinner and Haas 2014) concludes that "[...] the HSAP represents the best currently available measuring stick for respect for WCD [[[World_Commission_on_Dams_(WCD)_Report|World Commission on Dams]]] provisions in individual projects." (p.44)
Download
► Download all documents relating to the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol
Further Information
