Hydro - Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) - Revision history

Avinash Kumar at 13:24, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T13:24:49Z

Ranisha: /* Literature & References */

2015-04-23T07:00:59Z

Literature & References

Ranisha: /* Case Studies & Examples */

2015-04-23T06:58:26Z

Case Studies & Examples

Ranisha at 06:52, 23 April 2015

2015-04-23T06:52:36Z

Show changes

Ranisha: /* Literature & References */

2015-04-22T14:28:49Z

Literature & References

Ranisha at 14:26, 22 April 2015

2015-04-22T14:26:36Z

Ulrike v. Schlippenbach: /* EIA Procedure */

2015-04-22T14:20:59Z

EIA Procedure

Ulrike v. Schlippenbach: /* EIA Procedure */

2015-04-22T14:20:09Z

EIA Procedure

Ulrike v. Schlippenbach: /* Literature & References */

2015-04-22T14:12:29Z

Literature & References

Ulrike v. Schlippenbach at 14:08, 22 April 2015

2015-04-22T14:08:22Z

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 '''Figure 1'''''': EU Procedure<ref name="http://ec.europa.eu/environment/legal/law/pdf/eia/2%20EIA%20%20SEA%20Intro%20final.pdf">http://ec.europa.eu/environment/legal/law/pdf/eia/2%20EIA%20%20SEA%20Intro%20final.pdf</ref>'''
-&nbsp;During screening it is determined whether or not a full EIA is to be carried out. The European EIA Directive (2011/92/EU, Art.5<ref name=" http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm"> http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm</ref>), for example, always demands an EIA when storage or water held back by the dam project exceeds 10 million cubic meters (Annex I, 15). Another common approach is to classify dams into categories A, B or C, depending on type, location, sensitivity, and scale, as well as on the nature and magnitude of potential impacts, and then demand different depth of study (e.g. World Bank OP 4.01).<br/>
+&nbsp;During screening it is determined whether or not a full EIA is to be carried out. The European EIA Directive (2011/92/EU, Art.5<ref name="http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm"> http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm</ref>), for example, always demands an EIA when storage or water held back by the dam project exceeds 10 million cubic meters (Annex I, 15). Another common approach is to classify dams into categories A, B or C, depending on type, location, sensitivity, and scale, as well as on the nature and magnitude of potential impacts, and then demand different depth of study (e.g. World Bank OP 4.01).<br/>
 During scoping stage content and level of detail of analysis is defined. The EU directive, for example, states as minimum information to provide:&nbsp;<br/>
@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 = Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)<br/> =
-The Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) complements the environmental impact assessment. The main difference: The SEA applies in an earlier stage of decision making than the EIA and at a broader, national level. While the EIA is employed only in the case of the approval of proposed environmentally significant projects, the SEA is already being done at the national planning level. Important strategic decisions with environmentally significance are often made already in the course of national planning and programing. (BMUB 2013)<ref name=" http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/"> http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/</ref><br/>
+The Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) complements the environmental impact assessment. The main difference: The SEA applies in an earlier stage of decision making than the EIA and at a broader, national level. While the EIA is employed only in the case of the approval of proposed environmentally significant projects, the SEA is already being done at the national planning level. Important strategic decisions with environmentally significance are often made already in the course of national planning and programing. (BMUB 2013)<ref name="http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/"> http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/</ref><br/>
 Thus, while the EIA analyses specific projects the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) focuses on strategic directions which are incorporated in (public''') plans and programs'''. It thereby ensures that potential impacts are “fully included and appropriately addressed at the earliest appropriate stage of decision-making” (Sadler & Verheem, 1996).<br/>
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 The results obtained from the SEA are primarily relevant for national plans and programs and set the basis for strategic decisions. SEA addresses the coordination between different sectors, the appraisal of sectorial interests and objectives, as well as the ranking of priorities to establish coherent national policies. This can, for example, include prioritization of individual technologies and their regional allocation. Compared to EIA, the search for “reasonable alternatives taking into account the objectives and the geographical scope of the plan or programme” (EU) plays a pivotal role and often is mandatory (e.g. EU Directive 2001/42/EC<ref name="http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0042">http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0042</ref>). While both EIA and SEA are instruments for impact assessment, the scope of SEA is enlarged in order to adequately cover large scale developments that cannot be represented by single EIAs.
 = Case Studies&nbsp;& Examples<br/> =
-*[http://www.ahec.org.in/links/International%20conference%20on%20SHP%20Kandy%20Srilanka%20All%20Details\Papers\Environmentsal%20Aspects-B\B22.pdf Environmental Impacts of Small Hydro Power Projects - India]
+*[http://www.ahec.org.in/links/International conference on SHP Kandy Srilanka All Details\Papers\Environmentsal Aspects-B\B22.pdf Environmental Impacts of Small Hydro Power Projects - India]
 This paper outlines the advantages of SHP, barriers in the development of SHP, EIA process in India, regulatory framework, EIA of SHP projects, case studies of EIA of six SHP projects in the state of Uttarakhand, their impacts on ecological resources & human environment and EMP. It is concluded that there has been low to medium impacts of the projects on the surrounding environment.<br/>
@@ Line 66: / Line 67: @@
 '''Good Practice Handbook for Large Hydro (by&nbsp;IFC/International Finance Corporation)'''<br/>
-IFC published a Good Practice Handbook on Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management. It provides guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets and introduces a six-step process to identify cumulative impacts, as well as a guide for the effective design and implementation of measures to manage such cumulative effects. <br/>
+IFC published a Good Practice Handbook on Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management. It provides guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets and introduces a six-step process to identify cumulative impacts, as well as a guide for the effective design and implementation of measures to manage such cumulative effects.<br/>
 ►[http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/3aebf50041c11f8383ba8700caa2aa08/IFC_GoodPracticeHandbook_CumulativeImpactAssessment.pdf?MOD=AJPERES Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management: Guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets]<br/>
@@ Line 72: / Line 73: @@
 *&nbsp;'''Guidelines for CEIA/Turkey'''<br/>
-Turkey developed guidelines for cumulative EIAs together with the World Bank. The Government of Turkey promoted investments in hydroelectric power plant (HEPP) projects as a policy priority, in response to concerns about the environmental and climate change impact of other power generation technologies, as well as with an eye to compliance with EU regulations and targets. The rapid growth in investments raises concerns about the associated impacts (such as minimum environmental flow, temporary/permanent roads opened for the investment, etc.) and the significance of the cumulative impact of multiple HEPP projects on the river basins. Guidelines to Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) have been prepared within the scope of a CEIA technical assistance study (CEIA study) supported by the World Bank. The CEIA study was developed based on the need to assess the cumulative impacts of hydropower projects in Turkey and was conducted in coordination and cooperation with the relevant departments of the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (MoEU) and the Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs (MoFWA). <br/>
+Turkey developed guidelines for cumulative EIAs together with the World Bank. The Government of Turkey promoted investments in hydroelectric power plant (HEPP) projects as a policy priority, in response to concerns about the environmental and climate change impact of other power generation technologies, as well as with an eye to compliance with EU regulations and targets. The rapid growth in investments raises concerns about the associated impacts (such as minimum environmental flow, temporary/permanent roads opened for the investment, etc.) and the significance of the cumulative impact of multiple HEPP projects on the river basins. Guidelines to Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) have been prepared within the scope of a CEIA technical assistance study (CEIA study) supported by the World Bank. The CEIA study was developed based on the need to assess the cumulative impacts of hydropower projects in Turkey and was conducted in coordination and cooperation with the relevant departments of the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (MoEU) and the Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs (MoFWA).<br/>
 <span style="font-size: 13.6000003814697px; line-height: 20.4000015258789px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">►</span>[https://www.esmap.org/node/2964 ESMAP Website]<br/>
@@ Line 78: / Line 79: @@
 *&nbsp;'''SEA by Mekong River Commission (MRC)'''<br/>
-the Mekong River Commission (MRC) conducted a SEA on potential developments in its river basin. <br/>
+the Mekong River Commission (MRC) conducted a SEA on potential developments in its river basin.<br/>
 <span style="font-size: 13.6000003814697px; line-height: 20.4000015258789px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">►</span>&nbsp;[http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/Consultations/SEA-Hydropower/SEA-Main-Final-Report.pdf Strategic Environmental Assessment of Hydropower on teh Mekong Mainstream]
 = Further Information<br/> =
@@ Line 95: / Line 97: @@
 <br/>
 = Literature &&nbsp; References<br/> =
@@ Line 100: / Line 103: @@
 <references /><br/>
-*'''EU Directives:&nbsp;'''EIA Directive 2011/92/EU and its amendments, relevant for EU Member States: [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm; <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm;</u>]<br/><u>EIA Directive 2014/52/EU, to become compulsory until 2017: </u>[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN <u>http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN</u>]
+*'''EU Directives:&nbsp;'''EIA Directive 2011/92/EU and its amendments, relevant for EU Member States: [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm; http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm;]<br/><u>EIA Directive 2014/52/EU, to become compulsory until 2017: </u>[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN]
-*&nbsp;'''UNECE: '''Espoo convention figures as reference for many national EIA implementations, Espoo Convention: [http://www.unece.org/env/eia/, <u>http://www.unece.org/env/eia/,</u>] SEA Protocol: [[http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html] <u>[http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html]</u><br/>
+*&nbsp;'''UNECE: '''Espoo convention figures as reference for many national EIA implementations, Espoo Convention: [http://www.unece.org/env/eia/, http://www.unece.org/env/eia/,] SEA Protocol: [[http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html] <u>[http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html]</u><br/>
-*&nbsp;'''World Bank:&nbsp;'''[http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTOPMANUAL/0,,contentMDK:20064724~menuPK:64701637~pagePK:64709096~piPK:64709108~theSitePK:502184,00.html World Bank&nbsp;: OP 4.01 - Environmental Assessment]
+*&nbsp;'''World Bank:&nbsp;'''[http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTOPMANUAL/0,,contentMDK:20064724~menuPK:64701637~pagePK:64709096~piPK:64709108~theSitePK:502184,00.html World Bank : OP 4.01 - Environmental Assessment]
 *&nbsp;'''IFC: '''Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management – Guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets;<br/>
 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;►[http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/3aebf50041c11f8383ba8700caa2aa08/IFC_GoodPracticeHandbook_CumulativeImpactAssessment.pdf?MOD=AJPERES Link to the publication]<br/>
-*'''Costs and benefits of the EIA Directive''', [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/Costs%20and%20benefits%20of%20the%20EIA%20Directive.pdf <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/Costs%20and%20benefits%20of%20the%20EIA%20Directive.pdf</u>]
+*'''Costs and benefits of the EIA Directive''', [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/Costs and benefits of the EIA Directive.pdf http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/Costs and benefits of the EIA Directive.pdf]
-*'''FAO''': Environmental impact assessment of irrigation and drainage projects [http://www.fao.org/docrep/V8350E/v8350e06.htm <u>http://www.fao.org/docrep/V8350E/v8350e06.htm</u>]
+*'''FAO''': Environmental impact assessment of irrigation and drainage projects [http://www.fao.org/docrep/V8350E/v8350e06.htm http://www.fao.org/docrep/V8350E/v8350e06.htm]
-*'''EU EIA Directive Webpage''': [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm</u>]
+*'''EU EIA Directive Webpage''': [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm]
-*'''BMUB Kurzinfo zu UVP und SUP&nbsp;''': [http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/ <u>http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo</u>]
+*'''BMUB Kurzinfo zu UVP und SUP&nbsp;''': [http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/ http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo]
 [[Category:Impacts]]

@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 <br/>
 = Literature &&nbsp; References<br/> =
@@ Line 99: / Line 100: @@
 <references /><br/>
-*'''EU Directives:&nbsp;'''EIA Directive 2011/92/EU and its amendments, relevant for EU Member States: [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm; <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm;</u>] <u>EIA Directive 2014/52/EU, to become compulsory until 2017: </u>[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN <u>http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN</u>]<br/>
+*'''EU Directives:&nbsp;'''EIA Directive 2011/92/EU and its amendments, relevant for EU Member States: [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm; <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm;</u>]<br/><u>EIA Directive 2014/52/EU, to become compulsory until 2017: </u>[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN <u>http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN</u>]
 *&nbsp;'''UNECE: '''Espoo convention figures as reference for many national EIA implementations, Espoo Convention: [http://www.unece.org/env/eia/, <u>http://www.unece.org/env/eia/,</u>] SEA Protocol: [[http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html] <u>[http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html]</u><br/>
-*&nbsp;'''World Bank:'''
+*&nbsp;'''World Bank:&nbsp;'''[http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTOPMANUAL/0,,contentMDK:20064724~menuPK:64701637~pagePK:64709096~piPK:64709108~theSitePK:502184,00.html World Bank&nbsp;: OP 4.01 - Environmental Assessment]
 *&nbsp;'''IFC: '''Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management – Guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets;<br/>
-&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/3aebf50041c11f8383ba8700caa2aa08/IFC_GoodPracticeHandbook_CumulativeImpactAssessment.pdf?MOD=AJPERES Link to the publication]<br/>
+&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;►[http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/3aebf50041c11f8383ba8700caa2aa08/IFC_GoodPracticeHandbook_CumulativeImpactAssessment.pdf?MOD=AJPERES Link to the publication]<br/>
 *'''Costs and benefits of the EIA Directive''', [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/Costs%20and%20benefits%20of%20the%20EIA%20Directive.pdf <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/Costs%20and%20benefits%20of%20the%20EIA%20Directive.pdf</u>]
 *'''FAO''': Environmental impact assessment of irrigation and drainage projects [http://www.fao.org/docrep/V8350E/v8350e06.htm <u>http://www.fao.org/docrep/V8350E/v8350e06.htm</u>]
 *'''EU EIA Directive Webpage''': [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm</u>]
-*'''BMUB Kurzinfo zu UVP und SUP&nbsp;''': [http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/ <u>http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/</u>]<br/>
+*'''BMUB Kurzinfo zu UVP und SUP&nbsp;''': [http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo/ <u>http://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/strategien-bilanzen-gesetze/umweltpruefungen-uvpsup/kurzinfo</u>]
 [[Category:Hydro]]

@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 The results obtained from the SEA are primarily relevant for national plans and programs and set the basis for strategic decisions. SEA addresses the coordination between different sectors, the appraisal of sectorial interests and objectives, as well as the ranking of priorities to establish coherent national policies. This can, for example, include prioritization of individual technologies and their regional allocation. Compared to EIA, the search for “reasonable alternatives taking into account the objectives and the geographical scope of the plan or programme” (EU) plays a pivotal role and often is mandatory (e.g. EU Directive 2001/42/EC<ref name="http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0042">http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0042</ref>). While both EIA and SEA are instruments for impact assessment, the scope of SEA is enlarged in order to adequately cover large scale developments that cannot be represented by single EIAs.
 = Case Studies&nbsp;& Examples<br/> =
@@ Line 65: / Line 66: @@
 '''Good Practice Handbook for Large Hydro (by&nbsp;IFC/International Finance Corporation)'''<br/>
-IFC published a Good Practice Handbook on Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management. It provides guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets and introduces a six-step process to identify cumulative impacts, as well as a guide for the effective design and implementation of measures to manage such cumulative effects. [http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/3aebf50041c11f8383ba8700caa2aa08/IFC_GoodPracticeHandbook_CumulativeImpactAssessment.pdf?MOD=AJPERES <u>http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/3aebf50041c11f8383ba8700caa2aa08/IFC_GoodPracticeHandbook_CumulativeImpactAssessment.pdf?MOD=AJPERES</u>]<br/>
+IFC published a Good Practice Handbook on Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management. It provides guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets and introduces a six-step process to identify cumulative impacts, as well as a guide for the effective design and implementation of measures to manage such cumulative effects. <br/>
 *&nbsp;'''Guidelines for CEIA/Turkey'''<br/>
-Turkey developed guidelines for cumulative EIAs together with the World Bank. The Government of Turkey promoted investments in hydroelectric power plant (HEPP) projects as a policy priority, in response to concerns about the environmental and climate change impact of other power generation technologies, as well as with an eye to compliance with EU regulations and targets. The rapid growth in investments raises concerns about the associated impacts (such as minimum environmental flow, temporary/permanent roads opened for the investment, etc.) and the significance of the cumulative impact of multiple HEPP projects on the river basins. Guidelines to Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) have been prepared within the scope of a CEIA technical assistance study (CEIA study) supported by the World Bank. The CEIA study was developed based on the need to assess the cumulative impacts of hydropower projects in Turkey and was conducted in coordination and cooperation with the relevant departments of the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (MoEU) and the Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs (MoFWA). [https://www.esmap.org/node/2964 <u>https://www.esmap.org/node/2964</u>]<br/>
+Turkey developed guidelines for cumulative EIAs together with the World Bank. The Government of Turkey promoted investments in hydroelectric power plant (HEPP) projects as a policy priority, in response to concerns about the environmental and climate change impact of other power generation technologies, as well as with an eye to compliance with EU regulations and targets. The rapid growth in investments raises concerns about the associated impacts (such as minimum environmental flow, temporary/permanent roads opened for the investment, etc.) and the significance of the cumulative impact of multiple HEPP projects on the river basins. Guidelines to Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) have been prepared within the scope of a CEIA technical assistance study (CEIA study) supported by the World Bank. The CEIA study was developed based on the need to assess the cumulative impacts of hydropower projects in Turkey and was conducted in coordination and cooperation with the relevant departments of the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (MoEU) and the Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs (MoFWA). <br/>
 *&nbsp;'''SEA by Mekong River Commission (MRC)'''<br/>
-the Mekong River Commission (MRC) conducted a SEA on potential developments in its river basin. [http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/Consultations/SEA-Hydropower/SEA-Main-Final-Report.pdf <u>http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/Consultations/SEA-Hydropower/SEA-Main-Final-Report.pdf</u>]<br/>
+the Mekong River Commission (MRC) conducted a SEA on potential developments in its river basin. <br/>
 = Further Information<br/> =

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 <br/>
 = Literature &&nbsp; References<br/> =
@@ Line 105: / Line 106: @@
 *'''EU Directives:&nbsp;'''EIA Directive 2011/92/EU and its amendments, relevant for EU Member States: [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm; <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-legalcontext.htm;</u>] <u>EIA Directive 2014/52/EU, to become compulsory until 2017: </u>[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN <u>http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0052&from=EN</u>]<br/>
 *&nbsp;'''UNECE: '''Espoo convention figures as reference for many national EIA implementations, Espoo Convention: [http://www.unece.org/env/eia/, <u>http://www.unece.org/env/eia/,</u>] SEA Protocol: [[http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html] <u>[http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html http://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html]</u><br/>
-*&nbsp;'''World Bank: '''<br/>
+*&nbsp;'''World Bank:
-[http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTOPMANUAL/0,,contentMDK:20064724~menuPK:64701637~pagePK:64709096~piPK:64709108~theSitePK:502184,00.html <u>http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTOPMANUAL/0,,contentMDK:20064724~menuPK:64701637~pagePK:64709096~piPK:64709108~theSitePK:502184,00.html</u>]
+&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/3aebf50041c11f8383ba8700caa2aa08/IFC_GoodPracticeHandbook_CumulativeImpactAssessment.pdf?MOD=AJPERES Link to the publication]<br/>
 *'''Costs and benefits of the EIA Directive''', [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/Costs%20and%20benefits%20of%20the%20EIA%20Directive.pdf <u>http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/Costs%20and%20benefits%20of%20the%20EIA%20Directive.pdf</u>]
 *'''FAO''': Environmental impact assessment of irrigation and drainage projects [http://www.fao.org/docrep/V8350E/v8350e06.htm <u>http://www.fao.org/docrep/V8350E/v8350e06.htm</u>]
@@ Line 130: / Line 134: @@
 </div></div></div>
 [[Category:Hydro]]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 <br/>
+<br/>
 == EIA Procedure<br/> ==
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 <br/>
 = Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) of&nbsp;Large Hydropower<br/> =
@@ Line 54: / Line 55: @@
 Small, run-of-the-river projects are free from many of the environmental problems associated with their large-scale relatives because they use the natural flow of the river, and thus produce relatively little change in the stream channel and flow. The dams built for some run-of-the-river projects are very small and impound little water - and many projects do not require a dam at all. Thus, effects such as oxygen depletion, increased temperature, decreased flow, and rejection of upstream migration aids like fish ladders are not problems for many run-of-the-river projects<ref>Small Hydropower Systems (Dept. of Energy USA, 2001): http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy01osti/29065.pdf</ref>.<br/>
 = Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)<br/> =
@@ Line 102: / Line 97: @@
 <br/>
 = Literature &&nbsp; References<br/> =
@@ Line 134: / Line 130: @@
 </div></div></div>
 [[Category:Impacts]]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 <br/>
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
 '''Figure 1'''''': EU Procedure'''[https://energypedia.info/index.php?title=Hydro_-_Environmental_Impact_Assessment_(EIA)&action=edit&mode=wysiwyg#_ftn1 '''<u><font color="#0066cc">[1</font></u>''']]
-&nbsp;<br/>
+&nbsp;During screening it is determined whether or not a full EIA is to be carried out. The European EIA Directive (2011/92/EU, Art.5[https://energypedia.info/index.php?title=Hydro_-_Environmental_Impact_Assessment_(EIA)&action=edit&mode=wysiwyg#_ftn2 <u><font color="#0066cc">[2</font></u>]]), for example, always demands an EIA when storage or water held back by the dam project exceeds 10 million cubic meters (Annex I, 15). Another common approach is to classify dams into categories A, B or C, depending on type, location, sensitivity, and scale, as well as on the nature and magnitude of potential impacts, and then demand different depth of study (e.g. World Bank OP 4.01).<br/>
 During scoping stage content and level of detail of analysis is defined. The EU directive, for example, states as minimum information to provide:&nbsp;<br/>
@@ Line 36: / Line 35: @@
 #''any additional information specified in Annex IV relevant to the specific characteristics of a particular project or type of project and to the environmental features likely to be affected.''<br/>
-&nbsp;
+EIAs are project-specific, predicting the potential outcomes of a certain project. The search for alternatives is therefore usually limited to&nbsp; technical design issues. Although the EU Directive demands the description of project alternatives, this is limited to those “''studied by the developer”'' (Article 5, 3d). Instruments that seek to include assessment of alternatives at the earliest appropriate stage of decision-making are the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA; see below) and Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol (HSAP), where the Early-Stage Tool is of particular relevance for this aspect (->WIKI-LINK: HSAP). EIAs provide extensive public participation mechanisms during the whole process.<br/>
 Some finance institutes ask as part of their standard approval procedure EIAs to cover additional aspects that can go beyond legal requirements. The involvement of international finance institutes can therefore lead to the application of higher standards compared to non-involvement. Usually the project proponent has to pay for the study. In the case of the EU, EIAs[https://energypedia.info/index.php?title=Hydro_-_Environmental_Impact_Assessment_(EIA)&action=edit&mode=wysiwyg#_ftn3 <u><font color="#0066cc">[3</font></u>]] account for less than 1% of total project costs and take 1-2 years for completion[https://energypedia.info/index.php?title=Hydro_-_Environmental_Impact_Assessment_(EIA)&action=edit&mode=wysiwyg#_ftn4 <u><font color="#0066cc">[4</font></u>]].<br/>

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 <br/>
-== Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) of&nbsp;Large Hydropower<br/> ==
+= Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) of&nbsp;Large Hydropower<br/> =
 In combination with the impacts of other hydro projects within the same river basin, impacts can change or intensify. Therefore the scope of the impact assessment should not be limited to one project, but analyze the impacts with a view to other existing and planned projects. As an advanced version of an EIA, the Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) seeks to incorporate these effects into the assessment ''of a proposed project''. It therefore enlarges the scale of analysis to regional river basin level.<br/>
@@ Line 149: / Line 149: @@
 </div></div></div>
 [[Category:Impacts]]